|

Employers
should be clear about Internet policies
Published 07/08/05
While
the computer can be a productive tool in enhancing the employee's
performance, some employees abuse it and therefore employers should
take steps to investigate and prevent such abuse.
For
example, an employee may use the company computer for Internet access
for purely private and purient purposes, such as accessing a pornographic
website or an employee may use the e-mail for purposes of harassing
co-employees or others.
Some
employees are adept at hitting the minimize window when others are
near thereby appearing to be diligently working on the computer
when, in fact, they actually are not. Therefore, it is prudent for
an employer to consider notifying employees that their company computer
usage may be monitored by the employer accessing their computer
to see what Internet sites they have gone onto and the e-mails they
have sent, prepared, and/or received.
An
employer should have a written policy that clarifies to the employee
the use of the company computer is solely for company purposes and
the employer reserves the full right to access that computer to
determine the employee is complying with the policies and procedures.
The employee should specifically be made aware in writing that the
e-mail messages contained on the computer are all available for
monitoring by the employer. It may be appropriate that the employee
actually sign a consent form for such monitoring. This can be made
as a condition of their employment or continued employment with
the company, assuming that they are not under contract and are an
employee-at-will at that time.
While
there are federal and New Hampshire wiretap statutes, they generally
apply to actual interception of electronic transmissions. For example,
the recording of a telephone conversation while it is occurring
without the consent of the other participant is a crime in New Hampshire.
An employer may review records of prior transmissions on its own
computer without violating these laws.
Employers
should also educate their employees of the fact that e-mail transmissions
do not simply disappear because the employee has hit the delete
button. The employee should take the same care preparing internal
and external e-mails as they would in writing a printed memo or
letter understanding that, if at some point the topic of that e-mail
is pertinent to some future litigation, the e-mail may be able to
be recovered in discovery, notwithstanding the fact that the sender
and recipient may think they have "deleted" that message.
J.
Daniel Marr is a director and shareholder
at Hamblett & Kerrigan, P.A. His legal practice includes counseling
businesses and business persons on a variety of legal issues, including
employment, and advocating on their behalf. You can reach Attorney
Marr by e-mail at: dmarr@hamker.com
This information is general
information and may not reflect the most current legal developments,
verdicts or settlements. The information provided should not
be relied upon as an indication of the actual state of the
law or of future developments. The information contained on
the Hamblett & Kerrigan website is for informational purposes
only and does not constitute legal advice. If the information
referenced may be of legal importance to you, you should consult
with an attorney to provide you with legal guidance and opinion
as the the effect of the current law upon your situation. |