|

Loan
from employer has its hazards
Published 10/22/04
Borrowing
money from your boss has complications. There are
several issues that an employer and employee should consider in
regards to such loans. First, they should decide if it is to be
an advance on wages, salary, commissions or bonus, and if so, there
should be a specific written agreement between the parties acknowledging
this and authorizing specific credits or deductions from the compensation
that would have otherwise been due the employee but for the advance.
If
the loan is not in the form of an advance, then it is prudent to
have a promissory note signed by the employee in favor of the employer
setting forth the specific repayment terms and stating whether interest
is charged. It is important to understand that under New Hampshire
law, unless the promissory note specifically allows for prepayment,
then a prepayment is a breach of the note. While at the outset,
the employer may be more than willing to encourage prepayment with
such a clause, if it is left out and the employer/employee relationship
becomes acrimonious and interest is charged, the employer may insist
on no prepayments when the note is silent on the issue.
Promissory notes payable
on demand by the employer are just as enforceable as those with
a stated maturity date and periodic payment terms. However, a promissory
note payable merely on the demand of the employer may be argued
by the employee to have truly been intended as compensation rather
than a loan. If that is true, such a misrepresentation in the financial
records of the employer could amount to fraud on the IRS, creditors,
and/or investors, as well as tax fraud by the employee if the income
is not reported on his tax return.
While
a demand note is perfectly legitimate, given the unique relationship
between employer and employee not shared by other creditors and
debtors, the employer should be careful about even the appearance
of impropriety and it may be better served by using a term loan
rather than a demand loan.
If
the employee does not agree to repay the loan by deduction from
his employment compensation under written specific terms, then the
employer as a creditor of the employee may not offset the employee's
compensation against missed loan payments, and must resort to traditional
creditor remedies to collect this loan.
Employers
should also be cautious as to inconsistent characterizations of
a loan. For example, if an employee is using the money as down payment
for a house and the bank or mortgage company wants to see that this
money is not being borrowed, an employer who assists an employee
in a misrepresentation to the bank that these monies were not borrowed
could be subject to liability for that misrepresentation and further
possibly provide a later defense to repayment by an employee who
has already shown his willingness to misrepresent the truth.
Employees
who do enter into such loans should also remember that unless they
have a contract to the contrary, they are generally employed at
the will of the employer. If in the future they are having cash
flow difficulties it would be very unwise to become delinquent in
the loan from the employer, whose good graces the employee relies
upon for the retention of his job.
J.
Daniel Marr is a director and shareholder
at Hamblett & Kerrigan, P.A. His legal practice includes counseling
businesses and business persons on a variety of legal issues, including
employment, and advocating on their behalf. You can reach Attorney
Marr by e-mail at: dmarr@hamker.com
This information is general
information and may not reflect the most current legal developments,
verdicts or settlements. The information provided should not
be relied upon as an indication of the actual state of the
law or of future developments. The information contained on
the Hamblett & Kerrigan website is for informational purposes
only and does not constitute legal advice. If the information
referenced may be of legal importance to you, you should consult
with an attorney to provide you with legal guidance and opinion
as the the effect of the current law upon your situation. |